1- Clinical
Research Centre, Sibu Hospital, Sibu, Sarawak, Malaysia.
2-
Department of Pediatrics, Sibu, Sarawak, Malaysia.
3-
Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Southampton Children’s Hospital,
Southampton, United Kingdom.
COVID-19 has made things more complicated, but still, common things occur commonly. Many conditions share symptoms and signs, but when a common diagnosis seems likely, it’s usually the right one. Indeed, Occam’s razor advocates that when there are multiple hypotheses for one prediction, we should go for the one that requires less assumption. In other words, the simplest explanation is usually the correct explanation. We present an infant who came in with symptoms suggesting a cow’s milk allergy when the possibility of an adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine was raised – important and relevant in the context of vaccine hesitancy and the need for mass immunization to control the on-going pandemic.
Keywords: COVID-19 vaccination, cow’s milk protein allergy, allergic reaction,
adverse events, infant, breastfeeding
INTRODUCTION
“The oldest and strongest emotion
of mankind is fear, and the oldest and strongest kind of fear is fear of the
unknown” -H. P. Lovecraft
On the 4th of March
2021, three months had passed since the FDA approved the usage of the first
COVID-19 vaccine. There was insufficient research and trials on COVID-19
vaccines then to look at their effects on pregnant and breastfeeding mothers.
There was much anxiety with there being “just too many unknowns” about this new
vaccine, especially the effects of the mother’s COVID-19 vaccine-induced
antibodies and the components of the vaccine being passed on to fetuses and
infants. Post vaccination, maternal and child symptoms were not uncommon.1
Researchers have also found COVID-19 antibodies in breastmilk in breastfeeding
mothers after vaccination.2,3 Abide the
anxiety and unknown fear, there was a need to vaccinate urgently to try and
stem the pandemic. However, as a general principle, many policymakers and
clinicians were cautious about vaccination of pregnant and breastfeeding
mother’s while waiting for more data to support its use.
Now, supposing a breastfeeding
mother who recently received COVID-19 vaccination came to you with a child who
was unwell after feeding, what would you do? We describe a case to illustrate
the scenario whereby a breastfeeding mother who recently received COVID-19
vaccination presented with a child who was unwell after feeding; and discuss on
our approach to COVID-19 vaccination in breastfeeding mothers.
Case
Description
Seven days after the implementation
of the COVID-19 vaccination program on 4th March 2021 at one of the
hospitals in Sarawak, Malaysia, a 3-month-old male infant was rushed into the
Emergency Department following a life-threatening event at home. The mother, a
member of staff working in the intensive care unit, had received her first dose
of Comirnaty® vaccine at 10 am on
the day of presentation. As a result of her concerns about the
unknown effects of the vaccine, the breastfeeding mother tried to feed the
infant cow’s milk formula by bottle at 1 pm, but he did not cooperate and spat
everything out. Hence, the mother resorted to direct breastfeeding 15 minutes
later. The father, a hospital porter, noted erythematous rashes on the infant’s
trunk while the mother was still breastfeeding. As they rushed the infant to
the hospital, the parents described the infant to have stiffening of bilateral
upper limbs, blank staring eyes, perioral pallor and appeared to be short of
breath. The episode was estimated to have lasted for about five minutes. His
symptoms resolved on arrival at the Emergency Department. The infant had no
known history of allergy, and cow’s milk was given on day 1-2 of life during
admission for neonatal jaundice but had since been exclusively breastfed.
From Emergency Department, the
infant was admitted to the ward for further observation. Cardiac monitoring and
vital signs parameters were normal. In addition, neurological examination was
normal throughout, and there was no recurrence of a similar episode that might
suggest a convulsion. Baseline bloods were taken. There was no peripheral
eosinophilia, but the total white cell was mildly elevated. The liver function
and renal profiles were normal, except for serum sodium of 132 mmol/L. More serious conditions such as cardiac arrhythmias, seizures and sepsis
were considered, but deemed unlikely by the normal physical examinations and
bedside monitoring as well as basic blood investigations.
The rash resolved completely
without any intervention by 5:30 pm. The parents and many of the medical team
were concerned that the infant had reacted to the mother’s COVID-19
vaccination. About 20 hours later, we challenged the infant with 15 ml of
formula (from the same can brought from home), but this time the infant
remained well. After that, the infant went home, and the parents were advised
to continue giving expressed breast milk stored from before the mother’s
vaccination.
Two days after discharge, this
infant presented again to us with a generalized macular rash. This occurred
acutely, within 10 minutes of the same formula feed given previously having
been fed on expressed breast milk for the previous two days. The infant did not
have any other symptoms this time. The rash resolved after five hours without
treatment.
Based on the clinical presentation,
we believed the infant’s condition was suggestive of cow’s milk protein allergy
(CMPA). Given that the infants developed another episode of rash, although
lesser severity, after the parents challenged the infant with formula, and
because the infant's symptom resolved spontaneously, we did not perform
diagnostic tests such as skin prick test or food-specific IgE levels, which are
not easily accessible in our setting. We encouraged the mother to recommence
the breastfeeding or continue with expressed breastmilk she had stored. The child
remained well. We advised to not give cow’s milk formula till at least
one-year-old. The infant can start on a complementary diet at six months of
age, as per recommendation by World Health Organization (WHO).4 His
mother had her second dose of Comirnaty®
vaccine and avoided direct breastfeeding for a week. The infant was given an
appointment for follow up to monitor for growth and other symptoms, and if need
be, consider for a further diagnostic test for the CMPA.
The infant remained well on the last follow up.
Discussion
& CONCLUSION
In March 2021, none of the COVID-19
vaccines had recommended the use of their vaccines (or remained cautious) among
breastfeeding mother due to the lacking of clinical trial data. Nevertheless,
lacking safety data does not mean it is unsafe because there is no data or
recommendation to stop breastfeeding. World Health Organization has recommended
not to discontinue breastfeeding after COVID-19 vaccination.5
Breastfeeding is very important for infants, and at the same time, we should
not put the mothers at risk by not vaccinating them. Yet, anxiety among the
parents (and sometimes professionals) from the unknown is valid (refer to
parents’ perspective below). In contrast, the newborns may be protected by the
SARS-CoV-2-specific IgA and IgG in human milk after maternal vaccination.2,3
We reflected on this case and wanted to share it. We would like to make the
following recommendation when considering a breastfeeding mother for the
vaccine.
A careful assessment of the risk and
benefit of the mother and infant should be carried out, i.e. risk of the mother
getting the infection (job nature and community infection rate), the long-term
maternal health aspect of breastfeeding, and the benefits to the child’s
survival and cognitive development.6,7 Should the mother decided not to breastfeed
because of the concern about the COVID-19 vaccine, the accessibility, and
sustainability of providing the infants with alternative milk and in an
affordable manner should be assessed carefully, in line with the World Health
Organization recommendation.4 Should the child be already two years
or beyond, the mother may choose to receive the vaccine and stop breastfeeding
after a proper risk-benefit assessment. Suppose the mother belongs to the low-risk
groups (without comorbidities, living in a low-prevalence community and/or
low-risk job), the counselling session should include appropriate reassurance
based on available scientific evidence that are evolving all the time and
allowing the mother a free choice to decide on vaccination and/or stopping
breastfeeding. Should the mother falls into the high-risk group with COVID-19
infection prevalent in the community, and if a child is less than two years old
(and alternative milk is not a viable option), it is wise to recommend both the
COVID-19 vaccines to the mother and continue breastfeeding balancing the risks
(recognizing that lack of data on COVID-19 vaccine does not mean unsafe) and
benefits (of being vaccinated and the breastfeeding to infants). Having said
that, there have been some evidence on COVID-19 vaccination among breastfeeding mothers resulting in minimal
disruption of lactation or adverse impact on the breastfed child.1
There was anxiety in this case that
the infant had reacted to the mother’s COVID-19 immunization. There is evidence
that COVID-19 antibodies can pass into milk, but the effect on babies are
unknown.2,3 It is, however biologically implausible that this could
have occurred in this case. Based on the clinical presentation, we believe CMPA is the most likely cause. It is a
hypersensitivity reaction to cow’s milk protein initiated by specific
immunologic mechanisms. It is a common cause of food allergy among
infants in the western world as well as in Asia.7-9 The most common
allergic presentation in CMPA are rashes (70%), gastrointestinal (25%) and
respiratory (20%) symptoms.10 Infants exposed to cow’s milk may
present with an anaphylaxis11, or an acute life-threatening event
and seizures12 like our case. Diagnosis
often relies on the clinical history and symptoms, and food challenges are
often used to confirm the diagnosis.10 Although it may be helpful,
skin prick test and cow’s milk specific IgE are not sensitive or specific at
this age.10 Hence, the fundamental principles in the management of
CMPA involved dietary elimination and avoidance of cow’s milk protein. In our
child, although the diagnosis of CMPA has not been confirmed, we advised the
parents to continue breastfeeding and delay introducing cow’s milk according to
the WHO recommendation.
While we celebrate
a new era of vaccine to combat the global pandemic, much uncertainty remains
about the safety profiles or specific groups because we are still waiting for
more data rather than there being any proven toxicity. Until more data is
available from the on-going trials, anxiety will continue and clinicians will
need to stay vigilant to watch closely for any adverse reactions potentially
related to the vaccine. However, good clinical judgment is crucial to discern
an adverse reaction to the vaccine from other common pathologies. The old adage
wears well in this scenario; common things occur commonly.
Parent’s Perspective
Deciding on whether to receive the
COVID-19 vaccine was difficult for me. When the Ministry of Health first
announced that the hospital would start vaccinating the medical staff, there
was a mixed feeling of anxiety and relief. This is because there were so many
unknowns about the vaccine, the constant rumors about the adverse reactions and
breastfeeding mothers’ safety profiles. However, being a staff working in the
intensive care unit with frequent contact with patients with COVID-19, I
decided to go ahead with the vaccine.
While being briefed about the
vaccine, we were warned regarding the lack of safety data in lactating mothers
and pregnant women. My primary concern then was if this vaccine would affect my
child’s breastfeeding. I decided to get formula milk for my baby for the few
days after the vaccination and avoided breastfeeding.
I had my vaccination that morning,
and it was uneventful. When I reached home, I saw my boy crying for a feed;
hence I fed him the newly bought formula milk. He refused to take the bottle.
Helpless, I decided to take the risk and fed him my breastmilk. He was feeding
happily until my husband alerted me that my boy had developed a rash over his
trunk. I panicked! Self-blame set in. My first thought was, ‘Oh, what have I
done? The vaccine has caused this! I should not have fed him my milk so soon!’.
We rushed him to the hospital, but
it was the longest car ride ever, although we were just a short distance away.
My child turned limp in the car and with some jerky movement. Fortunately, it
stopped when we arrived at the hospital. The doctors promptly attended him.
They examined and re-explored the incident. The doctors told us that they could
not confidently rule out vaccine-related side effect, but cow’s milk protein
allergy was a likely diagnosis. However, the abnormal movement was not
expected. Hence, I was advised to continue feeding with expressed breastmilk
overnight and challenged him with cow’s milk formula the following day.
Fortunately, he tolerated the formula feed well, and we were discharged home. I
was advised to continue with the formula milk or expressed breastmilk for the
next few days before resuming direct feeding.
I remained skeptical about resuming
breastfeeding after the incident. At the same time, I was worried that the
previously stored expressed breastmilk might not be sufficient, so I tried
formula milk again, and within minutes, the rash reappeared. This time, the
doctors were sure that this was consistent with a cow’s milk protein allergy.
The doctors advised us to resume breastfeeding. I was initially apprehensive,
but he was doing well after a few feeds, which reassured me.
I went on to have my second
injection, and aside from the mild fever, I was well. However, this time, I was
mentally more prepared. I stored breastmilk sufficient for my child and avoided
direct breastfeeding for five days. The doctors advised avoiding cow’s milk
formula until at least one year of age. After all that had happened, I will
gladly adhere to the expert advice.
The events were very distressing to
my family and me. There was so much stigma surrounding the issue of the
COVID-19 vaccine. I self-blamed for taking up the vaccine when we initially
suspected the vaccine of causing the reaction. However, with a good explanation
from the doctors and reassurance from close monitoring, the diagnosis very soon
sank in. These events were unrelated to the vaccine but related to something
more commonly heard of, an allergic reaction to cow’s milk protein!
In hindsight, though frightening, I
firmly believe vaccination is the only effective panacea to the pandemic due to
so many unknowns. One should always get expert advice should there be any
concerns regarding the COVID-19 vaccine. This experience showed me that while
the adverse effects associated with the immunization remained a possibility,
more common and logical explanations are more likely to explain the reaction.
Overall, I will continue to support vaccination, even to those mothers who are
breastfeeding.
Acknowledgement
We
thank the Director General of Health Malaysia for his permission to publish
this case report. We appreciate the expertise input from Professor Saul Faust,
University of Southampton in the United Kingdom on the management of the infant
described in this report; as well as written permission from the infant’s
parents to publish their story.
AUTHORS’ DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
All the authors have no
financial conflict of interest to disclose.
FUNDING
STATEMENT
No funding was provided for
this article.