www.apjph.comwww.apjph.com
...
Volume 6, Jul - Sep 2023
Research Article:
Author’s Affiliation:

1-Department of Child Health, Prof. Ngoerah Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Udayana
2-Department of Clinical Pathology Prof. Ngoerah Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Udayana

Correspondence:
Ketut Dewi Kumara Wati, Email: dewi_kumara@unud.ac.id
Received on: 07-Aug-2023
Accepted for Publication: 17-Sep-2023
Article No: 2386Txo232038
PDF - Full Text
Abstract

Background: Pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus (pSLE) has become increasingly prevalent in pediatric wards, accounting for 10%-20% of all SLE patients. While the clinical significance of antinuclear antibody (ANA) immunofluorescence (IF) staining patterns has been reported in relation to disease presentation, limited research has explored whether different ANA IF staining patterns are associated with distinct clinical features in pSLE.

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the association between ANA IF staining pattern and clinical manifestations, as well as ANA titer, in pSLE patients.


Methods: ANA-positive pSLE subjects were recruited from the Prof. Ngoerah General Hospital between 2015 and 2022. The association between ANA IF staining pattern and ANA titer was analyzed using the likelihood ratio test. The association between ANA IF staining pattern with organ involvement and specific clinical manifestation was analyzed using the contingency coefficient test. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.


Results: A total of 130 ANA-positive pSLE subjects were included in the study. The female-to-male ratio was 3.3:1, and the median age at diagnosis was 14 ± 3.5 years. Eight types of ANA IF staining patterns were identified, with speckled and homogenous patterns being the most common. The majority of subjects had ANA titers higher than 1:1000. The speckled pattern was evenly distributed across a wide range of titers, while the homogenous pattern tended to be concentrated at higher ANA titers (p=0.004). The gastrohepatology system showed a significant association with ANA IF staining patterns (contingency coefficient 0.720, p<0.001). Additionally, ANA IF staining patterns were significantly associated with ascites, photosensitivity, colitis, and lymphopenia (contingency coefficient 0.372, p=0.007; 0.401, p=0.002; 0.720, p<0.001; 0.348, p=0.022, respectively).

Conclusion: The findings suggest that ANA IF staining patterns are associated with ANA titers, organ involvement, and specific clinical manifestations in pSLE, with potential diagnostic implications.


Keywords: pediatric SLE, antinuclear antibody, ANA IF staining pattern, clinical manifestation, organ system

INTRODUCTION

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by the involvement of multiple organ systems, resulting from a complex interplay of environmental, hormonal, and genetic factors.1 Pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus (pSLE) has exhibited a significant rise in prevalence within pediatric healthcare settings, accounting for approximately 10-20% of all SLE cases.2 Compared to adult-onset SLE, pSLE is known to present with a more severe clinical course, higher disease activity, and a greater likelihood of major organ involvement. Consequently, early and accurate diagnosis of pSLE is crucial for improved prognosis; however, it remains challenging due to its relatively low prevalence and diverse clinical manifestations.3–7

Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are autoantibodies that target various cellular constituents and play a crucial role in screening and diagnosing systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs), including SLE. Despite the longstanding recognition of autoantibodies in SLE, their precise role in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and prognosis of the disease is still an active area of investigation.5,6

Patterns of ANA staining has been associated with specific nuclear antigens, which in turn have implications for the clinical presentation of SLE. However, there have been limited reports regarding the clinical significance of ANA staining patterns specifically in pSLE patients, and even fewer studies have explored whether different ANA immunofluorescence (IF) staining patterns may correlate with distinct clinical features in this population. Therefore, the aim of this study is to describe the ANA IF staining patterns observed in pSLE patients and investigate the potential associations between these patterns, ANA titers, and the clinical manifestations of pSLE. The findings from this study are expected to enhance our understanding of pSLE and contribute to the improvement of early diagnosis and treatment strategies.

 

METHODS

This retrospective observational study was conducted at Prof. Ngoerah General Hospital, a tertiary teaching hospital and referral center for pSLE patients in Bali, Indonesia, and nearby provinces. The study included all patients below 18 years old who were diagnosed with SLE between 2015 and 2022. Data was collected retrospectively from the Bali Pediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (BEATLES) database.

Subjects with positive ANA test were included in the study, while those with incomplete medical records or comorbidities including infectious or non-infectious causes such as metabolic or congenital disease that could interfere with clinical presentation at the time of diagnosis were excluded. Subject characteristics, including gender, age at diagnosis, year of diagnosis, referral status, origin, ANA titer, and ANA IF staining pattern at diagnosis were documented.

Clinical manifestations recorded at the time of diagnosis were recorded to define the clinical spectrum of the disease. Manifestations were categorized based on system organ involvement or specific within-organ system manifestations, defined as follow:

-        Hematology organ involvement comprised of specific clinical manifestations including leukopenia (WBC count < 4000/mm3), lymphopenia (lymphocyte count < 1500/mm3), anemia (hemoglobin below normal range based on age; below 11 g/dL up to 5 years, below 11.5 g/dL from 5-11 years, below 12 g/dL from 12-14 years or female teenager > 15 years, and below 13 g/dL for male teenager > 15 years old) and thrombocytopenia (thrombocyte count < 100.000/mm3).8,9

-        Neuropsychiatric system involvement comprised of specific clinical manifestations, including seizures, headache, acute confusional state, peripheral neuritis, intracranial bleeding.

-        Cardiology involvement comprised of specific clinical manifestations including pericarditis / pericardial effusion, abnormal valve involvement, cardiomegaly / cardiomyopathy.

-        Pulmonary involvement comprised of specific clinical manifestations including pleuritis / pleural effusion.

-        Gastrohepatology involvement comprised of specific clinical manifestations including raising of liver enzymes with or without liver enlargement, abdominal pain or abdominal bleeding unexplained by other condition.

-        Skin and mucocutaneous involvement comprised of specific clinical manifestations including malar rash, discoid rash, subcutaneous chronic lupus erythematosus (SCLE) rash, alopecia, oral ulcers, photosensitivity, Raynaud phenomenon.

-        Musculoskeletal involvement comprised of specific clinical manifestations regarding any sign of myositis or arthritis, including swelling, warmth, tender, redness range of movement limitation on the joint / muscle.

-        Fever: any raising temperature reported by parents from history taking, documented by prior hospital or our hospital. As fever might represent certain infectious disease, we also collect data on the chronicity of the fever onset, pattern of raising temperature, particularly during the evening or night.

-        Electrolyte imbalance: any out of normal range of electrolyte level, including sodium imbalance, potassium imbalance and calcium imbalance.

The presence of at least one clinical presentation in a particular organ was considered as involvement of the organ system. Subtypes of ANA IF staining pattern along with its titer found in our subjects were documented in this study. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize subject characteristics as numbers and percentages. The association between ANA IF staining pattern and ANA titer was analyzed using likelihood ratio test. The association between ANA IF staining pattern and organ involvement, as well as specific clinical manifestations, was analyzed using contingency coefficient test. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0 was utilized for data analysis. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Health Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine Universitas Udayana, and approval was also obtained from Prof. Ngoerah General Hospital.

 

RESULTS

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics

A total of 130 subjects who met the study criteria were included in the analysis. The study population had a female-to-male ratio of 3.3:1, and the median age at diagnosis was 14 ± 3.5 years. The majority of subjects were referred from other hospitals and from outside the city of Denpasar.

 

 

Figure 1. Research flow

 

Hematology involvement was the most common organ involvement, observed in 103 subjects (85.4%). Anemia was the most common clinical presentation, occurring in 70% of subjects. ANA immunofluorescence (IF) staining patterns were classified into eight types, including nuclear (homogenous, speckled, nucleolar, discrete nuclear dots, and nuclear envelope), cytoplasmic (speckled and fibrillar), and mitotic patterns (spindle fibers). The most frequently observed pattern among our subjects was nuclear speckled, and the majority had an ANA titer of more than 1:1000. Most subjects presented with a single ANA IF staining pattern, although one subject exhibited three patterns at the time of diagnosis.

Table 1. Subject characteristics

Subject characteristics

Value n(%)

Gender

 

Male

30 (23.1)

Female

100 (76.9)

Age (years)

 

≤ 5

3 (2.3)

6 - 11

35 (26.9)

12-18

92 (70.8)

Referral

 

Other hospital

78 (60.0)

Other division

28 (21.5)

Not referral

24 (18.5)

Origin

 

Denpasar

30 (23.1)

Outside Denpasar

84 (64.6)

Outside Bali

16 (12.3)

Year of Diagnosis

 

2015

1 (0.8)

2016

4 (3.1)

2017

5 (3.8)

2018

17 (13.1)

2019

37 (28.5)

2020

28 (21.5)

2021

13 (10.0)

2022

25 (19.2)

ANA titer

 

1:100

39 (30.0)

1:320

11 (8.4)

1:1000

39 (30.0)

>1:1000

69 (53.1)

ANA pattern

 

Homogenous

56 (43.1)

Speckled

68 (52.3)

Nucleolar

6 (4.6)

Cytoplasmic speckled

20 (15.4)

Cytoplasmic fibrillar

2 (1.5)

Spindle fibers

1 (0.8)

Discrete nuclear dots

3 (2.3)

Nuclear envelope

1 (0.8)

Number of patterns

 

Single pattern

103 (79.2)

Two patterns

26 (20.0)

Three patterns

1 (0.8)

 

Associations of ANA IF staining patterns with ANA titer and clinical manifestations

Our findings revealed a significant association between ANA IF staining patterns and ANA titer. The homogenous pattern tended to be more prevalent at higher ANA titers, while the speckled pattern was evenly distributed across all ANA titer groups (p=0.01) (Table 2). The distribution of ANA IF staining patterns across organ involvement categories showed no notable variation (Table 3). However, a significant association was found between the gastrohepatology system and ANA IF staining pattern (contingency coefficient 0.720, p <0.001). Furthermore, specific clinical manifestations, including ascites (0.372, p=0.007), photosensitivity (0.401, p=0.002), colitis (0.720, p <0.001), and lymphopenia (0.348, p=0.022), were significantly associated with ANA IF staining pattern.

Table 2. Association between ANA IF staining pattern and ANA titer

ANA titers

Homogenous (%)

Speckled

(%)

Nucleolar (%)

Cytoplasmic speckled (%)

Cytoplasmic fibrillar (%)

Spindle fiber (%)

Discrete nuclear dots (%)

Nuclear envelope (%)

n (%)

p-value

1:100

6 (10.7)

26 (38.2)

1 (16.7)

3 (15)

N/A

N/A

1 (33.3)

1 (100)

39 (30.0)

0.01

1:320

3 (5.4)

6 (8.8)

N/A

N/A

1 (50)

N/A

1 (33.3)

N/A

11 (8.5)

1:1000

19 (33.5)

12 (17.6)

1 (16.7)

4 (20)

1 (50)

1 (100)

1 (33.3)

N/A

39 (37.7)

>1:1000

28 (50)

24 (35.3)

4 (66.6)

13 (65)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

69 (53.1)

N (%)

56 (100)

68 (100)

6 (100)

20 (100)

2 (100)

1 (00)

3 (100)

1 (100)

 

 

*N/A: not available

Table 3. Association between ANA IF staining pattern and system organ involvement

Organ Involvements

Homogenous (%)

Speckled (%)

Nucleolar (%)

Cytoplasmic speckled (%)

Cytoplasmic fibrillar (%)

Spindle fiber (%)

Discrete nuclear dots (%)

Nuclear envelope (%)

Homogenous-Speckled (HS) (%)

n (%)

Contingency Coefficient

p -value

Cardiology

16 (38.1)

19 (36.5)

3 (50)

7 (53.8)

N/A

1 (100)

1 (33.3)

N/A

7 (63.6)

54 (41.5)

0.237

0.461

Pulmonary

28 (66.7)

32 (61.5)

5 (83.3)

9 (69.2)

N/A

1 (100)

1 (33.3)

N/A

8 (72.7)

83 (63.8)

0.228

0.522

Neuropsychiatry

11 (26.2)

8 (15.4)

1 (16.7)

3 (23.1)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

2 (18.2)

25 (19.2)

0.159

0.908

Kidney

31 (73.8)

29 (55.8)

3 (50)

9 (69.2)

1 (50))

1 (100)

1 (33.3)

1 (100)

10 (90.9)

85 (65.4)

0.299

0.690

Hematology

35 (83.3)

52 (84.6)

6 (100)

11 (84.6)

2 (100)

1 (100)

1 (33.3)

1 (100)

11 (100)

111 (85.4)

0.269

0.257

Gastrohepatology

17 (40.5)

16 (30.8)

N/A

5 (38.5)

N/A

N/A

N/A

1 (100)

1 (9.1)

40 (30.8)

0.720

<0.001

Skin and mucocutaneous

26 (61.9)

32 (61.5)

5 (83.3)

9 (69.2)

2 (100)

1 (100)

3 (100)

N/A

10 (90.9)

87 (66.9)

0.258

0.320

Musculoskeletal

25 (59.5)

26 (50)

5 (83.3)

8 (61.5)

1 (50)

1 (100)

2 (66.7)

N/A

6 (54.5)

75 (57.5)

0.229

0.969

*N/A: not available


Table 4. Association between ANA IF staining pattern and clinical manifestation

Clinical Manifestations

Homogenous

Speckled

Nucleolar

Cytoplasmic speckled

Cytoplasmic fibrillar

Spindle fiber

Discrete nuclear dots

Nuclear envelope

Homogenous-speckled/ HS

n (%)

Contingency coefficient

p-value

Cardiology

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pericarditis

4 (9.5)

3 (5.8)

0

3 (23.1)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

4 (36.4)

14 (10.8)

0.384

0.092

pericardial effusion

7 (16.7)

6 (11.5)

3 (50)

1 (7.7)

N/A

1 (100)

1 (33.3)

N/A

2 (18.2)

21 (16.2)

0.402

0.069

Abnormal valve involvement

2 (4.8)

7 (13.5)

1 (16.7)

3 (23.1)

N/A

1 (100)

1 (33.3)

N/A

2 (18.2)

17 (13.1)

0.291

0.149

Cardiomegaly

4 (9.5)

5 (9.6)

N/A

4 (30.8)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1 (9.1)

14 (10.8)

0.329

0.472

Cardiomyopathy

1 (2.4)

2 (9.6)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1 (33.3)

N/A

1 (9.1)

5 (3.8)

0.335

0.421

Pulmonary

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pleurisy

12 (28.6)

23 (34.6)

2 (33.3)

6 (46.2)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

7 (63.6)

46 (35.4)

0.327

0.487

Pleural effusion

16 (38.1)

16 (26.9)

3 (50)

3 (23.1)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1 (9.1)

37 (28.5)

0.324

0.504

Neuropsychiatry

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Headache

1 (2.4)

2 (3.8)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

2 (18.2)

5 (3.8)

0.231

0.499

Seizures

3 (7.1)

5 (7.7)

1 (16.7)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1 (9.1)

10 (7.7)

0.097

0.996

Psychosis

8 (19)

4 (7.7)

1 (16.7)

1 (7.7)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1 (9.1)

15 (11.5)

0.178

0.833

Acute confusional state

3 (7.1)

2 (3.8)

1 (16.7)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

7 (5.4)

0.293

0.728

Intracranial hemorrhage

N/A

N/A

N/A

1 (7.7)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1 (0.8)

0.175

0.999

Kidney

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proteinuria

26 (61.9)

24 (46.2)

2 (33.3)

4 (30.8)

N/A

N/A

1 (33.3)

N/A

8 (72.7)

65 (50.0)

0.278

0.208

Hematuria

18 (42.9)

17 (32.7)

2 (33.3)

6 (46.2)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

7 (63.6)

50 (38.5)

0.243

0.418

Pyuria

16 (38.1)

6 (11.5)

2 (33.3)

2 (15.4)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

3 (27.3)

29 (22.3)

0.293

0.143

Urinary casts

4 (9.5)

10 (19.2)

1 (15.7)

2 (15.4)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

2 (18.2)

19 (14.6)

0.148

0.939

Peripheral edema

15 (35.7)

10 (19.2)

N/A

4 (30.8)

N/A

1 (100)

1 (33.3)

N/A

6 (54.5)

37 (28.5)

0.298

0.123

Ascites

12 (28.6)

4 (7.7)

N/A

5 (38.5)

N/A

N/A

N/A

1 (100)

N/A

22 (16.9)

0.372

0.007

Hypertension

8 (19)

3 (5.8)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

4 (46.4)

15 (11.5)

0.311

0.084

Hematology

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Leukopenia

14 (33.3)

12 (23.1)

3 (50)

4 (30.8)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

3 (27.3)

36 (27.7)

0.194

0.750

Lymphopenia

23 (54.8)

22 (42.3)

6 (100)

7 (53.8)

N/A

N/A

1 (33.3)

N/A

10 (90.9)

69 (53.1)

0.348

0.022

Anemia

31 (73.8)

34 (65.4)

3 (50)

11 (84.6)

2 (100)

1 (100)

N/A

1 (100)

9 (81.8)

91 (70.0)

0.294

0.138

Thrombocytopenia

11 (26.2)

9 (17.3)

1 (16.7)

1 (7.7)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

3 (27.3)

25 (19.2)

0.182

0.813

Gastrohepatology

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transaminitis

17 (40.5)

16 (30.8)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1 (9.1)

39 (30.0)

0.268

0.259

Colitis

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1 (100)

N/A

1 (0.8)

0.707

<0.001

Skin and mucocutaneous

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Malar rash

13 (31)

20 (38.5)

4 (66.7)

4 (30.8)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

7 (63.6)

48 (36.9)

0.291

0.741

Discoid rash

1 (2.4)

1 (1.9)

N/A

2 (15.4)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

5 (3.8)

0.236

0.470

SCLE rash

5 (11.9)

13 (25)

1 (16.7)

3 (23.1)

N/A

1 (100)

1 (33.3)

N/A

3 (27.3)

27 (20.8)

0.235

0.475

Alopecia

19 (45.2)

23 (44.2)

3 (50)

7 (53.8)

1 (100)

N/A

1 (33.3)

N/A

8 (72.7)

62 (47.7)

0.218

0.592

Oral ulcer

12 (28.6)

14 (26.9)

3 (50)

3 (23.1)

1 (100)

N/A

N/A

N/A

3 (27.3)

36 (27.7)

0.213

0.626

Photosensitivity

5 (11.9)

4 (7.7)

2 (33.3)

1 (7.7)

N/A

N/A

3 (100)

N/A

3 (27.3)

18 (13.8)

0.401

0.002

Raynaud phenomenon

1 (2.4)

2 (3.8)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

3 (2.3)

0.162

1.000

Epistaxis

1 (2.4)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1 (0.8)

0.150

1.000

Musculosceletal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Arthritis

25 (59.5)

26 (50)

5 (83.3)

8 (61.5)

1 (50)

1 (100)

2 (66.7)

N/A

6 (54.5)

74 (56.9)

0.229

0.969

Myositis

N/A

1 (1.9)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1 (0.8)

0.229

0.969

Electrolyte imbalance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sodium imbalance

10 (23.8)

10 (19.2)

2 (4.8)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1 (9.1)

25 (19.2)

0.232

0.965

Potassium imbalance

7 (16.7)

8 (15.3)

N/A

3 (23)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1 (9.1)

19 (14.6)

0.214

0.985

Calcium imbalance

19 (45.2)

15 (28.8)

2 (33.3)

6 (46.2)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

2 (18.2)

44 (33.8)

0.243

0.417

Fever

18 (42.9)

22 (42.3)

4 (66.7)

3 (23.1)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

4 (36.4)

51 (39.2)

0.236

0.467

*N/A: not available


DISCUSSION

This restrospective study aimed to investigate the association between ANA IF staining patterns, ANA titers, and clinical manifestations in order to identify potential diagnostic and prognostic implications for pSLE. We documented 130 ANA positive pSLE cases from 2015 to 2022, with a median age at diagnosis of 14 ± 3.5 years old and a female to male ratio of 3.3:1. Consistent with previous studies, our results revealed a high prevalence of anemia and hematology involvement in pSLE patients, followed by skin/mucocutaneous and kidney involvement.7,10–12

The International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP) has divided ANA IF staining pattern into 29 discrete HEp-2 cell IIF patterns on expert level and 13 subtypes on competent level. The distribution of ANA patterns in SLE may vary depending on clinical and ethnic differences, as reported in earlier studies.13 Eight types of ANA IF staining pattern were identified in our study, distributed into three main types of patterns: nuclear, cytoplasmic, and mitotic patterns. This study demonstrated that the speckled and homogenous patterns were the most common ANA IF staining patterns, which aligns with findings in both adult and pediatric SLE populations.14–16 Rare ANA IF staining patterns (frequency less than 1%) were also found in our subjects, including nuclear envelope and spindle fibers.17


We observed a significant association between ANA IF staining patterns and ANA titers. The speckled pattern was distributed across a wide range of titers, whereas the homogenous pattern was more concentrated at higher titers, particularly at 1:1000 or higher. This finding suggests a potential association between the intensity of ANA staining which indicated by higher titers, and organ involvements in pSLE.

Previous studies have suggested that ANA-IF staining pattern is correlated with specific autoantibodies, which may be related to particular clinical symptoms. Our findings showed associations between ANA IF staining patterns and specific clinical manifestations. Notably, the gastrohepatology organ system showed a significant association with ANA staining patterns, specifically the nuclear envelope pattern. This association may be linked to clinical manifestations such as colitis and differences in the distribution of ANA patterns in transaminitis. We also found significant associations were found between ANA staining patterns and clinical manifestations, including photosensitivity, colitis, ascites, and lymphopenia.

Photosensitivity was commonly presented with homogenous, speckled, or HS pattern and in all discrete nuclear dots pattern (100%). Colitis was probably associated with nuclear envelope pattern, and mixed pattern was more likely presented along with lymphopenia, though it could be presented as homogenous or speckled pattern alone. Ascites was commonly distributed in homogenous pattern, similar to serositis in other organs such as pericardial effusion or pleural effusion. These findings were statistically significant (p value < 0.05). These findings align with previous reports and highlight the potential diagnostic and prognostic value of ANA IF staining patterns in pSLE.18,19

The association between ANA IF staining pattern and clinical manifestation was statistically significant in accordance with Frodlund, et al. who showed that central nervous system was less often associated with homogenous pattern compared to other staining patterns, whereas arthritis and organ damage respectively were less often associated with speckled pattern and photosensitivity was significantly associated with anti-Ro/SSA antibodies which was more often associated with mixed (HS pattern).18

Previous studies have reported that lymphopenia is associated with increased disease activity and organ damage indices, as noted by Faddah et al.20 Additionally, Mughales et al. found that the mixed pattern was associated with the highest levels of lupus anticoagulant.14 Consistent with these findings, our study found that lymphopenia was frequently presented in HS pattern, although presentation with homogenous or speckled pattern was also possible. This may suggest that more antibodies were involved in the development of lymphopenia, which could reflect a more aggressive course of the disease.

 

Study Limitations

-        As our study was retrospective, some clinical features could not be specifically identified from the medical records, such as cardiomegaly without further evaluation with echocardiography.

-        The association of ANA IF staining pattern to a particular clinical manifestation in our study may reduce its clinical utility. Analyzing the association between staining pattern and a collection of symptoms as included in the disease activity index (SLEDAI) or damage index (SDI) may help extend its clinical relevance.

 

Implication and Recommendations

-        Children and adolescents with homogenous ANA IF staining pattern should be evaluated for ascites and serositis in lungs and heart, as these may be related to severe manifestations that increase the risk of mortality.

-        Children and adolescents with discrete nuclear dots ANA IF staining pattern should be informed about the risk of excessive activity under sunlight, and adequate protection should be provided to prevent photosensitivity.

-        Children and adolescents with rare patterns should be evaluated for the possibility of unusual presentations, such as colitis with nuclear envelope pattern.

-        Children and adolescents with presentations of more than one pattern, especially with the combination of the two most common patterns (homogenous and speckled - HS pattern), should raise awareness of the possibility of a more severe clinical course and lead to the investigation of lymphopenia.

 

CONCLUSION

Our study highlights the association between ANA IF staining patterns, ANA titer, and clinical manifestations in pSLE. These findings suggest potential diagnostic implications to a certain extent. Further exploration of these relationships and their potential clinical significance is warranted.

 

 References

1.          Gottlieb BS, Ilowite NT. Systemic lupus erythematosus in children and adolescents. Pediatr Rev. 2006;27(9):323.

2.          Levy DM, Kamphuis S. Systemic lupus erythematosus in children and adolescents. Pediatr Clin. 2012;59(2):345-364.

3.          Stichweh D, Pascual V. Systemic lupus erythematosus in children. In: Anales de Pediatria (Barcelona, Spain: 2003). Vol 63. ; 2005:321-329.

4.          Weiss JE. Pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus: more than a positive antinuclear antibody. Pediatr Rev. 2012;33(2):62-73.

5.          Choudhary V, Sharma A, Sharma VK. Determination and Prevalence of Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) Patterns in Autoimmune Disorders in a Tertiary Care Hospital, Jaipur. Galore Int J Heal Sci Res. 2022;7(1):26-32.

6.          Wijaya C, Nurulita A, Bahrun U. Correlation of antinuclear antibody profile with hematologic and renal disorders in systemic lupus erythematosus. Indones J Clin Pathol Med Lab. 2018;23(2):146-150.

7.          Sit JKK, Chan WKY. Risk factors for damage in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus in Asians: a case control study. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2018;16(1):1-11.

8.          Salehi-Abari I. ACR/SLICC revised criteria for diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoimmune Dis Ther Approaches. 2015;2(1):114.

9.          Organization WH. Haemoglobin Concentrations for the Diagnosis of Anaemia and Assessment of Severity. World Health Organization; 2011.

10.        Ahmed S, Ali SR, Karim F, et al. Childhood-Onset Systemic lupus erythematosus: A cohort study. J Coll Physicians Surg Pakistan JCPSP. 2018;28(5):365.

11.        Tan JHT, Hoh SF, Win MTM, Chan YH, Das L, Arkachaisri T. Childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus in Singapore: clinical phenotypes, disease activity, damage, and autoantibody profiles. Lupus. 2015;24(9):998-1005.

12.        Ilias MI, Ali JM, Ismail NZ, Rostenberghe H V, Rahman AA. Pediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) manifestations and outcomes in a tertiary hospital. Lupus Open Access. 2017;2:1-6.

13.        Chan EKL, Damoiseaux J, Carballo OG, et al. Report of the first international consensus on standardized nomenclature of antinuclear antibody HEp-2 cell patterns 2014–2015. Front Immunol. 2015;6:412.

14.        Al-Mughales JA. Anti-Nuclear Antibodies Patterns in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Their Correlation With Other Diagnostic Immunological Parameters. Front Immunol. 2022;13.

15.        Novianti F, Ghrahani R, Indraswari N. Pattern of Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay Antinuclear Antibody in Pediatric Lupus Nephritis. Int J Integr Heal Sci. 2020;8(1):38-42.

16.        Ghrahani R, Setiabudiawan B, Sapartini G. Pola antibodi antinuklear sebagai faktor risiko keterlibatan sistem hematologi lupus eritematosus sistemik pada anak. Maj Kedokt Bandung. 2015;47(2):124-128.

17.        Nanda R, Gupta P, Patel S, Shah S, Mohapatra E. Uncommon antinuclear antibody patterns as diagnostic indicators. Clin Biochem. 2021;90:28-33.

18.        Frodlund M, Dahlström Ö, Kastbom A, Skogh T, Sjöwall C. Associations between antinuclear antibody staining patterns and clinical features of systemic lupus erythematosus: analysis of a regional Swedish register. BMJ Open. 2013;3(10):e003608.

19.        Rodsaward P, Chottawornsak N, Suwanchote S, et al. The clinical significance of antinuclear antibodies and specific autoantibodies in juvenile and adult systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Asian Pacific J allergy Immunol. 2021;39(4):279-286.

20.       Faddah S, Elwakd M, Aboelenein A, Hussein M. Lymphopenia and systemic lupus erythematosus, a preliminary study: Correlation with clinical manifestations, disease activity and damage indices. Egypt Rheumatol. 2014;36(3):125-130.

Disclaimer: The Views and opinions expressed in the articles are of the authors and not of the journal.
Editor-In-Chief
Journal Office
Mid City Hospital, 3-A Shadman II
Jail Road, Lahore ,Pakistan
Managing Editor
Dr. Intan Juliana Abd Hamid
Support & Help
Assistant Editor
Dr. Sadia Shabbir Hussain
Support & Help
Digital Content Editor
Dr. Khalid Masud
Administrator