1- Department
of Community and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jaffna.
Continuity of care for
autistic children is a significant challenge for care providers. Structured
play activities are an evidence-based intervention for skill development among
these children. An adaptive Collaborative Care Model (CCM) was implemented at
the primary care level as a community-co-designed model to conduct
evidence-based interventions with continuous follow-ups. The study was
validated through periodical assessments of child growth milestones. The model
enhanced independence, showing 82% improvement in gross motor skill development
and 52% in pre-learning activities. In terms of life skill development, 35% of
individuals still required guidance to perform tasks. The fidelity of the study
demonstrated a 2:1 ratio of children to Community Health Workers (CHWs) in
service delivery. The penetration of the study was highlighted by the
continuous growth in the number of beneficiaries and the involvement of CHWs in
service delivery. This model holds promise for not only Sri Lanka but also
other countries in the region. By adapting the collaborative care approach to
local contexts, other countries can similarly enhance the developmental
outcomes of autistic children through structured play and continuous follow-up.
The successful implementation and scalability of this model make it a viable
solution for addressing the challenges in continuity of care for autistic
children across the region.
Keywords: Implementation, Community health workers, Play therapy, Autism, Primary care
INTRODUCTION
Autism spectrum
disorder (ASD) is a developmental disability caused by differences in the brain
that affect socialization, self-care and learning of the child [1]. Symptoms
can be observed from the age of 2 years, which include difficulty with
communication and interaction with other people, restricted interests, and
repetitive behaviors, as well as symptoms that affect their ability to function
in school, work, and other areas of life.
In
Sri Lanka, autism prevalence is at 1.07%, meaning it affects 1 in 93 children
between 18 and 24 months. [2]. Among the identified children with special needs,
10.6% of them are in school-age, and only 0.4% attended schools or special
education units [3]. While ASD is considered a lifelong disorder, an effective
intervention can improve a child's functioning [4]. The play-based
interventions with clinical reviews along with periodical assessments of growth
milestones were evidenced as post-diagnostic management of ASD [5].
Continuity of care at the community level is a challenging
task for the care providers because of social stigma, negative attitudes
towards children with special need, poor economic status of the parents, and
lack of trained human resources for service delivery [3]. A feasibility study
was conducted to implement structured play activities by training selected
community members as coaching assistants and empowering the parents of ASD
children in Jaffna District, Northern Province, Sri Lanka from 2020 to 2022 and
published [6].
The findings of the feasibility study facilitated the
researchers to empower the women as trained CHWs [7] to implement continuity of
care with clinical reviews and periodical assessment. Therefore, this study was
developed with an implementation plan of community co-designed model for
continuity care intervention for ASD children's skill development through
structured play activities with trained CHWs, clinical reviews and periodical
assessment in low-resource settings.
The aim of this study was to
implement a community co-designed model for continuity care to enhance the
skill development among autistic children.
Methodology:
The implementation study was carried out for a period of
three years, from May 2020 to May 2023. The primary care with clinical set-up
was selected as the study setting to achieve continuous follow-up, child-centered
care and address various clinical observations of ASD children during the study
period, such as stress, anxiety, attention deficit, hyperactivity, sleep,
gastroenterology and nutritional needs. The sample selection was done through
the referral system of primary care provider using snow ball sampling technique
according to the child's medical condition. Children aged between 2 and 15
years and their parents/ primary caregivers were selected for the study.
There were four phases in the study: preliminaries, pre-implementation,
implementation, and post-implementation. Each phase focused on certain
implementation outcomes. Each of the major implementation steps was also
considered a work package.
Phase 1: Preliminaries
The preliminaries phase was carried out for six months,
from May to November 2020. This phase aimed to assess acceptability and adaptability
among the core team members, stakeholders and target population. Two work
packages included in this phase.
Work package 1: Preliminaries for implementation
Challenges in self-care, socialization and learning with
autism and caregiving burden were reflected the need of implementing an evidence
based community co-designed model at primary care level to provide appropriate
and continuous care in clinical settings. Play therapy was selected as an evidence-based
post-diagnostic management plan for children with ASD to enhance functioning
skill development, which prevents or solves psychosocial difficulties and helps
to achieve optimal child-healthy growth or development in behaviour,
self-respect, socialization, expression of feeling or thoughts and learning
from others. Play therapy is cost-effective and recommended to provide
continuous sessions with organized child-centred individual plans [8].
CHWs were included into the continuous care plan to
facilitate not only conducting regular session but also to empower the
community to break negative attitude and social stigma towards special need
children. Clinical reviews and periodical assessments were planned according to
World Health Organization' child growth milestone [9].
Work package 2: Preparation for implementation
The primary care provider (Consultant Family Physician)
mapped school dropout girls aged above 18 years as the target group to train as
CHWs for continuity care delivery. The plan was presented to convince
stakeholders. Infrastructure facilities and physical space was arranged by
Green Memorial Hospital. Friends of Manipay agreed to pay staff salaries. A
behavioural change professional (Nutritionist) also joined the core team.
Phase 2: Pre-Implementation
The implementation phase was carried out for 18 months,
from May 2020 to November 2021. This phase aimed to develop a feasible
implantation plan and pilot it. There were two work packages in this phase.
Work package 3: Target group training
Six-month training program (May to November 2020) began
with involvement and engagement activities. The core team hired resource
persons from multiple disciplines for theoretical sessions for community health
workers. Soft skills towards the final destination of the training were organized
by the Core team with various exposures in a periodic manner, such as site
visits, interaction with autistic children, and experience sharing by
professionals and parents. Skills development and the challenges for an
autistic child were addressed as a plan with appropriate play activities for
gross motor skills, fine motor skills, sensory processing development, life
skills for independence, communication, creative skills, visual and auditory
skills for pre-learning and reading, writing and math for basic learning.
Work package 4: Feasibility study
The Feasibility study was carried out for 18 months from
2020 May to 2021 November (6). Structured child-centered individual and group
play activities through parental empowerment with the assistance of trained
CHWs and BCPs at primary care level was developed as the suitable service
delivery mode of continuity care in the low resource setting of Jaffna
District.
Phase 3: Implementation
The implementation phase was carried out for one year
from December 2021 to November 2022.
This phase aimed to implement the piloted plan with validation.
Work package 5: Fidelity study
According to the findings of the published feasibility
study, the components of service delivery could be organized in a similar way to
evidently proven Collaborative Care Model (CCM--figure 1) , which can be practised
at primary care level contented stepwise measurable targets with clinical
reviews (10). The formulated CCM was implemented with trained CHWs, behavioural
change professional (BCP), and Consultant Family Physician (CFP) as the
components of the service delivery triangle. Person-oriented medical records
were maintained for each child, and the overall general register was included
in the registry. The roles of each components of developed CCM and the frequency
of contacts were defined.
The children with autism were identified by the CFP
during clinical practice and referred to the collaborative care model system. An
assessment note of referral was received by the BCP. The detailed activity plan
was developed by the BCP after the client orientation period. The activity plan
was implemented by the trained CHWs. Two hours per day and six days in a week
were allocated for structured play activities for each child. CHWs facilitated
individual and group activities. The performance of the child was monitored by
BCP in every session, and the individual plan was changed accordingly. Once in
three months, the achievement of skill development was assessed by CFP.
Parents of the children were welcomed to gather
information to be involved in everyday skill development activities with CHWs. Also,
the parents were addressed by BCP regarding monthly goals in skill development
and observations of their children during the structured play activities.
Observation in the home and feedback of the parents were collected. Periodical
parental empowerment sessions and individual meetings were conducted by CFP to
update their understanding on child's development gaps and achievements.
Figure 1: Components of
collaborative care model
The steps of CCM were developed with measurable targets
of child growth milestones [9]. An institutional based
cross sectional descriptive study was carried out among seventeen children with
Autism Spectrum Disorder in pediatric center, Green Memorial Hospital, Manipay,
Sri Lanka to assess the status of motor domain, cognitive domain, life skill
and pre-learning skill using a comprehensive tool developed according to
literature review (Table 1). The activities were scored according the child’s
performance and then divided into number of items. The final score was
predicted whether such particular skill need to be introduced/ with guidance
the child can practice his own/ need to be modified/ need to be tuned fine
[10].
Table 1: Assessment Tool
Scales/ Subscales |
Examples of items |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
I.Fine motor domain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.Palm strength |
Play with hand bell |
|
|
|
|
|
2.Finger grasp |
Holding a pencil |
|
|
|
|
|
3.Manual dexterity |
Play xylophone |
|
|
|
|
|
4.Fingertip sensation |
Give ice cubes |
|
|
|
|
|
5.Reaching, manipulating,
exploring |
Reach the ring and
hold and start to play |
|
|
|
|
|
6.Speeding up of fine motor activities |
Put in coins into
Till box |
|
|
|
|
|
II.Gross motor domain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.Head and neck
control |
Follow the commands |
|
|
|
|
|
8.Hand muscle
movement |
Follow the commands |
|
|
|
|
|
9.Strengthening the
long muscles in hand and legs |
Follow the commands |
|
|
|
|
|
10.Control of the long muscle’s movement |
Follow the commands |
|
|
|
|
|
11.Body balance |
Instruct to stand
still for 2 minutes |
|
|
|
|
|
III.Life skills |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.Eye contact |
Regards a person
momentarily (count 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
13. Eye
co-ordination |
Hold the ring and moves
horizontal, vertical, and circular movement. |
|
|
|
|
|
14..Listening the
communication (Receptive Language)-. |
He understands
sentences of two familiar words in context |
|
|
|
|
|
15.Responding the
communication (expressive Language)- |
He can comment on
his own actions |
|
|
|
|
|
16.Routine self-
care activities |
Brushing, bathing,
clothing, etc |
|
|
|
|
|
17.Behavior in
outside- |
Be silence, walk
together |
|
|
|
|
|
18.Celebrating
special days |
Birthday function |
|
|
|
|
|
IV.Creativity/ Cognitive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.Different
shapes, colors, figures, scenarios |
He can fit shapes,
colors, figures, scenarios of different into each other |
|
|
|
|
|
20.Feel 3D
dimension |
Rectangular prism-
book/ gift box, Sphere- Ball, cone- carrot/ ice cream |
|
|
|
|
|
21.Stimulation for
thinking ability and imagination |
Mends broken doll
exactly |
|
|
|
|
|
22.Memory |
Uncovers toy
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.Understanding
relationship |
Discriminates
people |
|
|
|
|
|
V.Pre-learning skills |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.General talk |
Vocalizes four
different syllables |
|
|
|
|
|
25.Pencil control |
Reaches pencil and
attempt to write/ draw |
|
|
|
|
|
26.Differentiate odd- |
He can fit objects
of different object into each other |
|
|
|
|
|
27.Grouping similar objects- |
He can fit objects
of similar shapes |
|
|
|
|
|
28.Know numbers, letters |
Says 1,23.. A,B,C…
A.P.P.L.E. |
|
|
|
|
|
29.Able to understand and do simple math |
Count Apples in two bags |
|
|
|
|
|
30.Able to do easy language practice-
writing, listening, speaking, story telling |
Listens selectively
to familiar words and continue with task |
|
|
|
|
|
0- No need attention 1- Need to fine tune 2- Need further modifications
3- Need guidance 4- Need to introduce
The evidence-based practice implementation was validated
through the tool's quantification scores.
Phase 4: Post-implementation
The post implementation phase aimed to study the
penetration of service in the context for 6 months from December 2022 to May
2023. Coverage of service, client outcomes and involvement of CHWs and
stakeholders were quantified.
Indicators for evaluation:
Outcome indictors were used to measure the key milestone in
this study, which was developed by adapting Proctor et al, 2010 to measure Fidelity
and penetration. Data were collected under the themes of outcome indicators.
Data collection and
analysis
Routine clinical data was collected from the registry as quantitative
data of implementation process. The scores of periodical assessments were
considered as quantitative data of skill development activities for validating
the implementation. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze the data.
Results:
Validation of implementation
The validity of the implementation was measured with the
assessment tool. There were 17 children who participated in validation study. The
majority (64.7%, n=11) were males. The mean age was 7.5 (±2.4) years. The
scores of the dependent variables, viz., fine motor, gross motor, life skill,
creativity/ cognitive, and pre-learning skill were measured. The result
indicated that the majority (82.4%, n=14) of the children were found to perform
well independently in gross motor, while only 17.6% (n=3) of the children didn't
need help in fine motor activities. Life skills have to be developed with
further modification (35.3%, n=6). Guidance needed in creativity assessment
(70.6%, n=12) and pre-learning (52.9%, n=9) (11).
Fidelity of implementation
No changes were made to the adapted CCM model. , The
ratio between the number of children under care and CHWs, was maintained as 2:1
throughout the implementation process after the feasibility study. The table 2
illustrate the growth of indicators for client, service and implementation
outcomes.
Discussion:
In Sri Lanka population-based screening programmes for
autism in SriLanka, and autism screening is not a mandatory partof primary
health care [11]. In addition to such observation, a study carried out in
Colombo district also reported that the inadequate skills of health
professionals are one of the possible reasons for the delay diagnosis of Autism
[12].
Table 2: Indicators
of implementation
Indicators |
2020 Jun |
2020 Dec |
2021 Jun |
2021 Dec |
2022 Jun |
2022 Dec |
2023 Jun |
|
|||||||
Number of children |
1 |
5 |
15 |
22 |
26 |
30 |
34 |
|
|||||||
Number of days in a week for
service delivery |
3 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Number of empowerment sessions conducted
during 6 month periods |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Number of clinical review days
allocated for CFP in a week |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
Number of client allocated per
clinical review day (30minutes per child) |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
Number of observation days
allocated for BCP in a week |
3 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
Number of recruited CHWs |
5 |
7 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
Number of trainees as CHWs |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|
|||||||
Number of CHWs' salary paid by
stakeholders |
5 |
6 |
7 |
7 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
Ratio between children: CHWs |
1:5 |
5:7 |
3:2 |
2:1 |
2:1 |
2:1 |
2:1 |
Our study aimed to implement CHW-facilitated structured play
activities to enhance the skill development among children with ASD at the primary
care level. A previous case study from this clinic also reported that it was
obviously observed that whenever the child seems to be bored, parents were
asked to join with various activities such as artwork, imaginary play, jump
rope, catching or kicking the ball, reading, dancing, listening to music and
setting up activity stations (e.g., book area, drawing area, physical activity
area) [13].
According to Boyd et al (2010), co-design methods
can be used to improve patient experiences and services within healthcare
organisations through six step process as engage the benificeries by sharing
the information about co design, plan feasible through communication, explore
the influences and navigate, develop coordination plan with beneficerie’s
active participation, decide and change towards sustainability and emerged with
current environment [14]. In this case study also the six step process were
carriedout to form effective co designed model.
Results of the validation, fidelity and penetration
indicators highlighted the efficiency and effectiveness of the implementation.
Only convenience stakeholders participated in the feasibility study, which was
already published, and continued for the fidelity study as well. Therefore, the
contribution percentage as funders, infrastructures and facilities providers couldn't
be studied under adaptability, acceptability and adaptability indicators.
The research evidence reported strong relationship between treatment
effectiveness and the inclusion of parents in the therapeutic process and
maximum effect sizes occurring after approximately 30 treatment sessions [15], which
was observed in the co designed model also.
Further, system development towards maintenance and
sustainability can be suggested to incorporate parents as active participants
along with CHWs to conduct the service delivery. Also, qualitative analysis of beneficiaries'
satisfaction, empowerment status and sharing caregiver burden can be audited periodically
to monitor the maintenance. An outside referral channel can be developed to
expand the coverage.
This adapted CCM model can be implemented in other areas
of Northern Province with special trained primary care provider, behavioral
change professional and trained CHWs in low resource settings as a post
diagnostic care delivery for ASD at primary care level. CHWs are the
facilitating factors in this study because they could spread the positive
attitude in the community towards special need children and their skill
development to showcase independences future.
In addition to the study findings, the framework used for
implementation and indicators used for evaluation were piloted. The findings of
the study signified that the framework and indicators used were context
specific as well as could be generalized. Therefore, they can be recommended as
feasible materials for similar implementation studies. Further, developed CCM,
defined the roles of involvers thus paved the way towards maintenance and
sustainability of the system by creating standard operations procedures. Ultimately
pre-test, posttest design may evaluate effectiveness of traditional play
activities to build up self-care, socialization, and learning in children with
autism. Further, to provide a comprehensive care to the child partnership
should be developed with other institutions to handle the issues of limited
resources in the primary care settings.
Conclusion: The developed
Collaborative care model with community health workers, behavioral change
professional and Consultant Family Physician is most suitable community
co-design model to practice to enhance the functioning of ASD children through
continuity care for skill development with structured play activities, clinical
reviews and periodical assessment at primary care settings.
Conflict of interest: There is no conflict
of interest among the core team, stake holders and beneficiaries.
Acknowledgement: The core team
acknowledge the staff in Pediatric Neurodevelopment clinic, Green Memorial
Hospital, Manipay, Friends of Manipay and Family Health Center, Kondavil for
their support in this study. Participants of each levels were acknowledge for
their contribution.
References: