Primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs), recently reclassified as inborn errors of immunity (IEIs), represent a heterogeneous group of over 500 genetically defined disorders that impair the development or function of the immune system. Although individually rare, collectively they have a significant global health impact, contributing to recurrent infections, autoimmunity, autoinflammation, allergy, and malignancy. Advances in next-generation sequencing and immunological profiling have expanded the diagnostic landscape, enabling earlier recognition of atypical presentations and novel disease entities. Nevertheless, delayed diagnosis remains a challenge, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where access to specialized testing and therapies is limited. Clinically, PIDs are diverse and may manifest from infancy to adulthood, often with overlapping phenotypes. The classical presentation of severe, recurrent, or unusual infections is increasingly recognized to be accompanied by immune dysregulation, including cytopenia, lymphoproliferation, and organ-specific autoimmunity. Early identification is essential, as timely interventions such as immunoglobulin replacement, antimicrobial prophylaxis, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and targeted biologic therapies significantly improve outcomes. This article provides an overview of the evolving understanding of PIDs, highlighting their clinical spectrum, diagnostic strategies, and therapeutic advances. By raising awareness among clinicians and health systems, it aims to reduce diagnostic delays and optimize patient care. Greater integration of molecular diagnostics, registries, and international collaboration is key to advancing precision medicine in the field of primary immunodeficiencies.
Keywords: Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases, Inborn Errors of Immunity, T cell defect.
Introduction
The human immune system is an intricate network of
organs, cells, and proteins essential for protecting the body from bacterial,
viral, and fungal infections [1]. It secures the body by identifying and
destroying destructive pathogens while conserving its own healthy cells. Primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs)
constitute a diverse array of hereditary disorders marked by deficiencies in
one or more elements of the immune system [2]. These conditions can manifest as
autoimmunity, lymphoproliferation or malignancies, and recurrent, severe, or
unusual infections. Individuals with PIDs are more susceptible to pathogens due
to weakened immune defences. PIDs encompass a broad spectrum of diseases that
impair the development, function, or regulation of the immune system. They are
typically inherited and can follow autosomal or X-linked patterns.
Globally, primary immunodeficiency affects over 6
million individuals, however, an estimated 70% to 90% of these cases remain
undiagnosed due to challenges in recognition and diagnosis. [3]. Over 400
varieties of primary immunodeficiency exist, differing in severity, which
influences their detection timing [4]. The number of cases of untreated primary
immunodeficiency considerably impacts morbidity and death, as lesser variants
are frequently found late, often in adults, whereas severe versions manifest in
infancy [5].
Primary Immunodeficiency
Diseases (PID) are very important in paediatrics because many of them are
present at birth and show up in infants or young children. Children with PID
often get infections repeated, poor respond to standard antibiotic treatments,
and failure to thrive. If these infections have not been diagnosed and treated
early, they can lead to serious long-term problems like organ damage,
developmental delays, or even death. So, paediatricians need to keep an eye out
for signs of PID so that they can diagnose and treat it quickly, which greatly
improves the patient's quality of life and health. The purpose of this
review is to examine recent advances in the understanding and management of
Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases (PID), focusing on clinical manifestations,
diagnostic approaches, and treatment options, with particular emphasis on their
significance in paediatric populations.
Classification
The group of Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases (PIDs) consists of more than 400 rare
inherited disorders which affect the immune system development and operation [6]. People with PIDs experience multiple infections and higher chances of autoimmune diseases and sometimes develop cancer [7]. The disorders follow a systematic classification
system recognised as IUIS
Classification and continuously updated bienally [8].
The main category of combined immunodeficiency impacts both T-lymphocyte and B-lymphocyte immune system functions.
The group includes
Severe Combined
Immunodeficiency (SCID) which causes life-threatening opportunistic infections and failure to thrive during
infancy [9]. The disorders become fatal when left untreated so patients need hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as their only hope for survival [4]. The most prevalent form of
PID consists of
predominantly antibody
deficiencies which result from insufficient immunoglobulin production [10]. The B-cell dysfunction in X-linked agammaglobulinemia and
Common Variable
Immunodeficiency (CVID) leads to recurring bacterial respiratory tract infections because T-cell function remains normal [11].
Various inherited defects of immunity can also be
syndromic or involve immune deficiency along with defects of other organ
systems. For example, DiGeorge syndrome is characterized by immune dysfunction
plus congenital heart disease, hypocalcaemia, and distinctive facial
characteristics, while Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome has a triad of eczema,
thrombocytopenia, and immune deficiency [12]. There are also defined immune
dysregulation disorders, which involve defects of mechanisms that would
normally prevent autoimmunity. The most well-known example is IPEX syndrome due
to mutations in the FOXP3 gene that can lead to severe autoimmune disease (e.g.
enteropathy, endocrinopathies, dermatitis) [13].
Functional deficiencies of phagocytes such as chronic
granulomatous disease (CGD) and the inability of immune cells to kill pathogens
due to defective ROS generation are among the possible phagocyte defects [14].
Patients with CGD commonly present with deep-seated bacterial and fungal
infections, especially catalase positive organisms, and granuloma formation
[15]. Defects in pulmonary immunity, such as impairment in MyD88 or IRAK-4 that
impairs early immune cell responses in addition to lack of pathogen recognition
receptor signalling, result in susceptibility to significantly increased
recurrent bacterial infection(s) [16]. In contrast, TLR3 contributed to
susceptibility to herpes simplex virus encephalitis [16].
Auto inflammatory diseases are characterized by
overwhelming and uncontrolled inflammation resulting from the fire-setting
activity of the innate immune system. Diseases like Familial Mediterranean
Fever, due to the MEFV gene mutations, present with recurrent episodes of
fever, serositis, and systemic inflammation [17]. Complement deficiencies on
the other hand, concern defective proteins in the complement cascade, resulting
in an incapacity to clear immune complexes and susceptibility to infections
[18]. Early component deficiencies (e.g., C1q, C2, and C4) are linked to
autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, whereas terminal
pathway deficiencies predispose to Neisseria infections [19].
Phenocopies of PIDs are defined as acquired disorders
that resemble genetic PIDs in their clinical presentation, yet are caused by
non‑inherited factors, which include somatic genetic mutations or the
production of host-derived autoantibodies directed against essential immune
mediators [20]. These phenocopies may mimic inherited immunodeficiency and
require a comprehensive and precise diagnostic assessment.
Early PIDs must be identified and diagnosed to prevent
severe complications and differences in clinical outcome [21]. Therapeutic
strategies should be aimed at the primary immunological abnormality e.g.
immunoglobulin replacement therapy for defects of antibodies or curative
measures (haematopoietic stem cell transplantation) for severe combined immunodeficiency
[22]. Advances in knowledge of PID pathogenesis have translated into the
development of more specific treatments and better diagnostic options for improved
care and long-term survival in these patients. Therefore, patients with
recurrent, unusual, or severe infections and unexplained autoimmune or
inflammatory manifestations should be adequately evaluated for the diagnosis,
timely treatment, and correct management of primary immunodeficiencies [22].
Clinical Presentation
Primary
immunodeficiency disorders (PID) embody a broad range of clinical presentation
that affecting the immune system that have their own unique effect on immune
system. Although it shares common symptoms with other conditions, careful diagnosis
is essential to ensure accurate identification and appropriate treatment.
People who suffer this diseases often experience recurrent or severe infection
unlike healthy people. Most patients with antibody deficiency syndromes
experience repeated infections with extracellular encapsulated bacteria, which
can be resolved with proper antibiotic therapy [23].
Some patients with transient hypogammaglobulinemia or
selective IgA deficiency may experience few or no infections. Patients with
antibody deficiency rarely experience fungal or viral infections, with the
exception of enterovirus. However, individuals with partial or complete impairments
in T-cell function frequently have infections with low-grade or opportunistic
bacterial, fungal, protozoal, and viral agents that are more severe than those
in patients with antibody deficiency and for which there is no effective
treatment [23]. Patients with primary T-cell defects rarely survive past
infancy [23]. Individuals who have certain T-cell abnormalities may be both neutropenia and
lymphopenia.
Severe combined
immunodeficiency [SCID], are characterized by a near complete absence of
immunological activity and functioning T cells. These conditions are uncommon
and can be broadly classified as either T cell-deficient but B-cell-positive
(T−, B+) or T and B-cell-deficient (T−, B−) [24]. In order to ascertain the
genetic phenotype of SCID, natural killer (NK) cell counts are also important
[25].In addition to having the highest level of vulnerability to all types of infections,
including opportunistic organisms, patients with SCID also completely lack of specialized
immunity. They frequently have persistent diarrhea and failure to thrive [25].
B-cell immunodeficiency mainly manifest with recurrent
sino-pulmonary infections with encapsulated bacteria, such as Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae, commonly
commencing after 6 months of age. Additionally, patients may have fatigue,
hearing loss, diarrhoea, and autoimmune symptoms [26].
Depending on the type of innate immune deficiency,
symptoms may include autoimmune-like traits, poor wound healing, or frequent,
severe infections. The Primary
Immunodeficiency Resource Centre (Jeffrey Modell Foundation) listed 10 warning
indicators to assist in identifying people with Primary Immunodeficiency
Disease (PID) in table 1 and table 2.
Diagnostic method
The diagnostic approach for primary immunodeficiency
disorders (PIDs) encompasses immunophenotyping, functional assays assessments,
and genetic evaluation. The initial assessment often involves the
quantification of T, B, and NK cells (TBNK) via flow cytometry to evaluate
lymphocyte subsets, in addition to the detection of immunoglobulin levels (IgG,
IgA, IgM). The evaluation of specific antibody responses (SAR) to vaccines like
tetanus and pneumococcal assesses functional humoral immunity. Functional
assays designed for suspected deficiencies, such as neutrophil oxidative burst
tests for phagocyte diseases or lymphocyte proliferation assays for T-cell
functionality, are also crucial. Genetic testing utilizing targeted gene panels
encompassing over 500 genes associated with primary immunodeficiency (PID) or
whole exome sequencing (WES) validates molecular diagnoses, informing
management and familial counselling. This thorough approach is essential due to
the diversity of primary immunodeficiency impacting various immunological compartments
and functions.
The lymphocyte subset enumeration (TBNK) test is a flow cytometry-based
assay that provides a quantitative measure of the predominant lymphocyte populations
within the blood, T lymphocytes (CD3⁺), B lymphocytes (CD19⁺), and natural killer (NK) lymphocytes (CD16⁺/CD56⁺) [28].The test is performed on venous blood collected in EDTA tubes [28].
Upon collection, the white blood cells (WBCs) from peripheral blood are stained
with fluorescent-labelled monoclonal antibodies that bind specifically to these
surface markers [29].Once red blood cells have been lysed, the blood sample is analysed
by flow cytometry. Flow cytometry counts and classifies lymphocytes based on
the fluorescence intensity of the binding antibodies [28]. Results are reported
as percentages and absolute counts of total T cells (CD3+), T-helper cells
(CD4+), T-cytotoxic cells (CD8+), B-cells (CD19+), and NK cells (CD16+CD56+)
groupings [30]. Age-related reference ranges are provided for interpretation [31].
Absolute counts are calculated using either internal bead standards or
volumetric methods and there is ancillary reporting for further
differentiation, such as the CD4/CD8 ratio [32].Thus, the application of the
TBNK test is key in the diagnosis of immunodeficiency and monitoring associated
changes in the immune system. For example, a severe decline or absence of T
cells from the above measurement indicates an increased likelihood of
immunodeficiency for example Severe Combined Immunodeficiency- SCID and Di George
Syndrome while the absence of a normal or near normal level of CD19 B cells may
warrant an assessment for X-linked agammaglobulinemia. Reduced counts of
NK cells can be genuinely found in GATA2 deficiency [30]. Furthermore, the
assay is useful for monitoring immune status in HIV infection and other
therapies depleting B cells, such as rituximab [30]. It is also an essential
screening tool that can serve an important purpose for directing the diagnostic
work up and treatment plans for abnormalities of the immune system [29].
Assessment of serum
immunoglobulin levels--IgG, IgA, IgM, and sometimes IgE, is important for the
evaluation of primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs) particularly those that
are characterized by defects in humoral immunity. Each immunoglobulin performs
different functions in host defence such as IgG which is the most abundant
antibody in serum providing long-term immunity by neutralizing pathogens,
opsonizing microbes and activating complement, IgA is the most abundant
antibody in mucosal surfaces, such as the respiratory tract and
gastrointestinal tract and prevents pathogen adherence and invasion, while IgM
is the first antibody produced in response to a pathogen, it is also effective
in activating complement and IgE is the least abundant and plays an important
role in allergic reactions, and activation of mast cells against parasites [33].
In PIDs such as X-linked
agammaglobulinemia (XLA), common variable immunodeficiency (CVID), and
selective IgA deficiency (SIgAD), immunoglobulin levels are markedly abnormal.
In XLA, nearly all classes of immunoglobulin are absent because of a developmental
arrest in the maturation of B cell, and in CVID there is often low IgG but low
IgA or IgM, with near-normal B cell counts.
An absolute serum IgG concentration of less than approximately 200 mg/dL
(2 g/L) is typically suggestive of significant antibody deficiency, but this
must be further interpreted in conjunction with the patient's age and clinical
context [34].
Serum immunoglobulin levels
substantially lower than the normal range for a patient's age may indicate
B-cell immunodeficiency. However, some individuals with B-cell immunodeficiency
may have normal and only modestly decreased immunoglobulin levels. Due to this
issue, antibody deficiency diagnosis is confirmed by measuring a patient's
specific antibody responses (usually IgG) to vaccines. This involves immunizing
the patient with protein antigens such as tetanus toxoid, and polysaccharide
antigens such as pneumococcal vaccines. Serum antibody levels are obtained
before and after vaccination, and in many primary immunodeficiency diseases,
these antibody responses are absent or reduced [35].
Assessing specific antibody responses provoked by
vaccines, such as a pneumococcal vaccine or a tetanus vaccine, is a fundamental
way to assess functional humoral immunity in situations where antibody
impairment is suspected but total immunoglobulin levels are normal. By
measuring serotype-specific IgG antibodies towards 23-valent pneumococcal
polysaccharide vaccine before and approximately 4 to 8 weeks after vaccination,
vaccines can assess the functional humoral immune response and the production
of T-cell independent antibody. A protective response typically defined as a four
fold increase (or reaching a threshold of 1.3 µg/mL) in the majority (50–70%)
of serotypes tested is evidence of normal B cell function and thus evidence
that a defect with a component of humoral immunity (like SAD) is not present
[36]. Tetanus vaccination assesses a T-cell dependent response by measuring IgG
antibodies directed against tetanus toxoid [37]. Some inadequate responses may
also indicate a more severe or combined immunodeficiency state if present. In
summary, vaccine response testing provides critical functional information that
goes beyond measuring static levels of immunoglobulins.
Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) and targeted genetic
panels are crucial genetic methods in the diagnosis of primary immunodeficiency
diseases (PIDs) [38]. WES sequences the entire exome of the genome in an
unbiased manner, which is ideal especially when patients have complicated or
unusual presentations that do not fall into known PID categories [39]. This
approach has the potential to find rare or even novel genetic mutations that
might otherwise be missed. It should be noted that WES requires specialized
skill-set for analysis and interpretation; has a long turnaround time for
interpretation can yield a significant number of variants of uncertain
significance (VUS) and uninformative incidental findings that have no relevance
to the patient’s immune function [40]. Conversely, targeted gene panels are
focused on curated list of PID associated genes, allowing for deeper coverage,
quicker turnaround time, cost-effective testing, and easier interpretation of
results which is preferable for patients presenting with classic clinical
presentations and suggestive of known PIDs [40]. Clinician preference generally
begins with targeted panel testing if the clinical features are clearly
indicative of a familiar PID but will move to WES if negative or to further
work-up of atypical or vague clinical symptoms of either unknown constellations
of immunodeficiency or congenital immune depletion tend to warrant a more
generic approach [38]. Some centres even claim that WES is considered the
first-line investigation in atypical or multisystemic cases in order to
maximize the diagnostic yield of next generation sequencing [41]. Targeted
panels provide a relatively efficient pathway for uncomplicated cases while WES
maximizes diagnostic utility for more complex cases [40]. The selection of one
or the other depends on the clinical context, available resources, and specific
aims of diagnosis, or patient management [40].
Therapeutic Approach
Primary immunodeficiency diseases with chronic or
severe diseases often need a lifelong therapy to prevent infection that severe
or recurrent. This therapeutic approach is critical for improving disease
development, minimizing complications, and improving patient health. The
management of this diseases generally includes immunoglobulin replacement
therapy to enhance immune function, antibiotics to reduce infection risk, and
hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Individuals with immunodeficiency disorders that
result in low levels or dysfunction of IgG often receive immunoglobulin
replacement. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) is a type of antibody present in blood
plasma. IgG used for this treatment is a plasma-derived product obtained from healthy
donors. The therapy can be administered either intravenously on a monthly basis
or subcutaneously once a week or biweekly. Both routes are effective in
restoring IgG to sufficient levels for infection protection [42]. The initial recommended
dose for immunoglobulin (Ig) replacement therapy is typically 400–600 mg/kg
every 4 weeks for intravenous (IV) administration and 100–150 mg/kg per week
for the subcutaneous (SC) route [43]. The dosage adjustments may be necessary according
to infection frequency which is important to monitor level of IgG regularly.
Lower IgG trough levels have been linked to the worsening of chronic lung
disease, even in patients without obvious symptoms [44]. This highlights the
importance of maintaining adequate serum IgG levels, and clinicians should
consider increasing the dose if the patient shows deteriorating lung function
or continues to suffer from recurrent infections. In cases of frequent
infections, preventive antibiotic therapy especially targeting Streptococcus
pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae might be required in addition to Ig
therapy. Depending on the specific B-cell immunodeficiency, antifungal
prophylaxis may also be necessary.
Routine hearing evaluations and pulmonary monitoring
are advised because B-cell disorders can be linked to hearing impairments and
lung complications, Similar to T-cell deficiencies, patients with B-cell
disorders should also be closely monitored for signs of malignancy and
autoimmune diseases [45].
The long term antibiotics prophylaxis are crucial in
improving the survival of individual with primary immunodeficiency diseases
aiming to reduce the severity and frequency of infections [46]. Antibiotic
therapy, particularly of azithromycin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
(TMP-SMX), is a standard in preventing infective complications of the majority
of primary immunodeficiency (PID), from chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) to
severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) and antibody deficiencies such as
common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) [47]. TMP-SMX remains the drug of
choice for prophylaxis of Pneumocystis
jirovecii pneumonia, while azithromycin has been found effective in
reducing the frequency of pulmonary exacerbations and preserving respiratory
function in antibody-related immunodeficiency [48].
Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HSCT) is a key
component of a permanent cure for SCID. Strong and long-lasting immunity
reconstitution and over 90% long-term survival are guaranteed when the
transplant is carried out with a HLA- matched sibling donor. HSCT from related
donors who are HLA-mismatched can also produce excellent results, particularly
if done during the first three and a half months of life [49]. The methodology
for HSCT and the associated risk has evolved significantly over the last twenty
years, with an increase in potential donor sources, improved targeting of
preparatory chemotherapy protocols, and enhanced supportive care [50].
Conclusion
Primary immunodeficiencies represent a diverse and
evolving group of disorders that extend beyond recurrent infections to
encompass immune dysregulation, autoimmunity, and malignancy. Advances in
molecular diagnostics and newborn screening have transformed the landscape of
early detection, while novel targeted therapies offer the promise of precision
medicine. However, disparities in access to diagnostic resources and treatment
remain a major global challenge. Strengthening awareness among clinicians,
expanding registry data, and fostering international collaboration are
essential to improve timely recognition and optimize patient outcomes.
Ultimately, integrating clinical expertise with genetic and immunological
insights will be key to advancing care for individuals with primary
immunodeficiencies.
References
1.
Department
of Health & Human Services. Immune system explained [Internet]. Better
Health Channel. Available from: https://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/health/conditionsandtreatments/immune-system
2.
McCusker
C, Upton J, Warrington R. Primary immunodeficiency. Allergy Asthma and Clinical
Immunology [Internet]. 2018 Sep 1; 14(S2). Available from:
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-018-0290-5
3.
Meyts
I, Bousfiha A, Duff C, Singh S, Lau YL, Condino-Neto A, et al. Primary
immunodeficiencies: a decade of progress and a promising future. Frontiers in
Immunology [Internet]. 2021 Feb 18; 11. Available from:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7935502/
4.
CDC.
[Internet]. Primary Immunodeficiency (PI). 2024. Available from:
https://www.cdc.gov/primary-immunodeficiency/about/index.html
5.
Bahrami
A, Sayyahfar S, Soltani Z, Khodadost M, Moazzami B, Rezaei N. Evaluation of the
frequency and diagnostic delay of primary immunodeficiency disorders among
suspected patients based on the 10 warning sign criteria: A cross-sectional
study in Iran. [Internet]. 2020 May 11; 48(6):711–9. Available from:
https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-allergologia-et-immunopathologia-105-articulo-evaluation-frequency-diagnostic-delay-primary-S0301054620300641
6.
McCusker
C, Upton J, Warrington R. Primary immunodeficiency. Allergy Asthma and Clinical
Immunology [Internet]. 2018 Sep 1; 14(S2). Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6157160/
7.
McCusker
C, Warrington R. Primary immunodeficiency. Allergy Asthma and Clinical
Immunology [Internet]. 2011 Nov 10; 7(S1). Available from:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3245434/
8.
Bousfiha, A., Moundir, A.,
Tangye, S.G. et al. The 2022 Update of IUIS Phenotypical Classification for
Human Inborn Errors of Immunity. J Clin Immunol 42, 1508–1520 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-022-01352-z
9.
Aranda
CS, Guimarães RR, De Gouveia-Pereira Pimentel M. Combined immunodeficiencies.
Jornal De Pediatria [Internet]. 2020 Dec 17; 97:S39–48. Available from:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9432339/
10. Fried AJ, Bonilla FA.
Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of primary antibody deficiencies and
infections. Clin Microbiol Rev [Internet]. 2009 Jul 1; 22(3):396–414. Available
from:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2708392/
11. Immunodeficiency UK.
Primary antibody deficiency - Immunodeficiency UK [Internet]. Immunodeficiency
UK. 2025. Available from:
https://www.immunodeficiencyuk.org/immunodeficiency/primary-immunodeficiency/primary-antibody-deficiency/
12. Poplonyk AS, Begier K,
Dorota A, Dabrowska M, Galecka D, Wawrzeniak K. Syndromic immunodeficiencies: A
paediatricians perspective on selected diseases. Allergologia et
immunopathologia, 2021. Doi:10.15586/aei.v49i4.200
13. Immune dysregulation,
polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome: MedlinePlus Genetics
[Internet]. Available from:
https://medlineplus.gov/genetics/condition/immune-dysregulation-polyendocrinopathy-enteropathy-x-linked-syndrome/
14. Wolfe LC, Keefe E. Pediatric Chronic Granulomatous Disease. eMedicine
[Internet. Available from:https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/956936-overview#a5
15. Dinauer MC. Chronic
granulomatous disease and other disorders of phagocyte function. Hematology
[Internet]. 2005 Jan 1; 2005(1):89–95. Available from:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16304364/
16. Maglione PJ, Simchoni N,
Cunningham‐Rundles C. Toll‐like
receptor signaling in primary immune deficiencies. Annals of the New York
Academy of Sciences [Internet]. 2015 Apr 30; 1356(1):1–21. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4629506/
17. Jeong DC. Systemic
autoinflammatory disorders. Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics [Internet].
2023 Jun 19; 66(10):432–8. Available from:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10556796/
18. Complement blood test
[Internet]. Available from:
https://medlineplus.gov/lab-tests/complement-blood-test/
19. Complement deficiencies |
Immune Deficiency Foundation [Internet]. Available from:
https://primaryimmune.org/understanding-primary-immunodeficiency/types-of-pi/complement-deficiencies
20. Singh A, Jindal AK, Joshi
V, Anjani G, Rawat A. An updated review on phenocopies of primary
immunodeficiency diseases. Genes & Diseases [Internet]. 2019 Sep 24; 7(1):12–25.
Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7063430/
21. Battersby AC, Cant AJ.
Advances in primary immunodeficiencies. Paediatrics and Child Health. 2017;
27:116–120. Available from doi:10.1016/j.paed.2016.11.001.
22. Primary immunodeficiencies
(PID) clinical update. Australian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy
[Internet]. 2025. Available from:
https://www.allergy.org.au/images/stories/pospapers/ASCIA_HP_Clinical_Update_PID_2025.pdf
23. Buckley RH. Advances in the
diagnosis and treatment of primary immunodeficiency diseases. Arch Intern Med
[Internet]. 1986; 146(2):377. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1986.00360140207031
24. McCusker C, Upton J,
Warrington R. Primary immunodeficiency. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2018;
14:61. doi:10.1186/s13223-018-0290-5
25. Bonilla FA, Khan DA, Ballas
ZK, Chinen J, Frank MM, Hsu JT, et al. Practice parameter for the diagnosis and
management of primary immunodeficiency. Journal of Allergy and Clinical
Immunology [Internet]. 2015; 136(5):1186-1205.e78. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2015.04.049
26. McCusker C, Upton J,
Warrington R. Primary immunodeficiency. Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology
[Internet]. 2018 Sep 1; 14(S2). Available from:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6157160/#CR14
27. Jeffrey Modell Foundation.
10 warning signs of primary immunodeficiency [Internet]. info4pi.org. Available
from: https://info4pi.org/library/educational-materials/
28. Lymphocyte subsets (TBNK) -
North West London Pathology [Internet]. North West London Pathology. Available
from: https://www.nwlpathology.nhs.uk/tests-database/lymphocyte-subsets-tbnk/
29. BD MultiTestTM 6-Color TBNK
Kit | BD Biosciences [Internet]. BD Biosciences | Flow Cytometry Instruments
and Reagents. 2023. Available from:https://www.bdbiosciences.com/en-eu/products/reagents/flow-cytometry-reagents/clinical-diagnostics/multitest-6-color-tbnk-kit
30. Lymphocyte surface marker
analysis: CD4 count; TBNK Immunology Laboratory Oxford University Hospitals
[Internet]. Available from:
https://www.ouh.nhs.uk/immunology/diagnostic-tests/tests-catalogue/lymphocyte-surface-marker-analysis/
31. Apoil PA, Puissant-Lubrano
B, Congy-Jolivet N, Peres M, Tkaczuk J, Roubinet F, et al. Reference values for
T, B and NK human lymphocyte subpopulations in adults. Data in Brief
[Internet]. 2017 Apr 21; 12:400–4. Available from:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5415546/
32. Ward RY, Stevens M, Bashir
S. Metrological traceability in flow cytometry? Evaluation of a new volumetric
method for lymphocyte subsets. International Journal of Laboratory Hematology
[Internet]. 2023 Dec 19; 46(3):488–94. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.14219
33. Janeway CA Jr, Travers P,
Walport M, Shlomchik MJ. The distribution and function of immunoglobulin
isotype Immunobiology-NCBI Bookshelf [Internet]. 2001. Available from
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK27162/
34. Rezaei N, Hedayat M, Aghamohammadi
A, Nichols KE. Primary immunodeficiency diseases associated with increased
susceptibility to viral infections and malignancies. Journal of Allergy and
Clinical Immunology [Internet]. 2011 Apr 25; 127(6):1329-1341.e2. Available
from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2011.02.047
35. McCusker C, Upton J,
Warrington R. Primary immunodeficiency. Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology
[Internet]. 2018 Sep 1; 14(S2). Available from:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6157160/#Sec10
36. Hansen AT, Söderström A,
Jørgensen CS, Larsen CS, Petersen MS, Jensen JMB. Diagnostic vaccination in
clinical practice. Frontiers in Immunology [Internet]. 2021 Sep 30; 12.
Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.717873
37. Orange JS, Ballow M, Stiehm
ER, Ballas ZK, Chinen J, De La Morena M, et al. Use and interpretation of
diagnostic vaccination in primary immunodeficiency: A working group report of
the Basic and Clinical Immunology Interest Section of the American Academy of
Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
[Internet]. 2012; 130(3):S1–24. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2012.07.002
38. Vorsteveld EE, Hoischen A,
Van Der Made CI. Next-Generation Sequencing in the field of primary
immunodeficiencies: current yield, challenges, and future perspectives.
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology [Internet]. 2021 Mar 5; 61(2):212–25.
Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7934351/
39. Borghesi A, Trück J, Asgari
S, Sancho-Shimizu V, Agyeman PKA, Bellos E, et al. Whole-Exome sequencing for
the identification of rare variants in primary immunodeficiency genes in
children with sepsis: a prospective, population-based cohort study. Clinical
Infectious Diseases [Internet]. 2020: 71(10):e614–23. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa290
40. Engelbrecht C, Urban M,
Schoeman M, Paarwater B, Van Coller A, Abraham DR, et al. Clinical utility of
whole exome sequencing and targeted panels for the identification of inborn
errors of immunity in a Resource-Constrained setting. Frontiers in Immunology
[Internet]. 2021 May 21; 12. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.665621
41. Simon AJ, Golan AC, Lev A,
Stauber T, Barel O, Somekh I, et al. Whole exome sequencing (WES) approach for
diagnosing primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) in a highly consanguineous
community. Clinical Immunology [Internet]. 2020 Mar 3; 214:108376. Available
from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2020.108376
42. Immunoglobulin (IGG)
Replacement Therapy defined | AAAAI [Internet]. Available from:
https://www.aaaai.org/tools-for-the-public/allergy,-asthma-immunology-glossary/immunoglobulin-(igg)-replacement-therapy-defined
43. Shehata N, Palda V, Bowen
T, Haddad E, Issekutz TB, Mazer B, et al. The Use of Immunoglobulin therapy for
Patients with Primary Immune Deficiency: An Evidence-Based Practice Guideline.
Transfusion Medicine Reviews [Internet]. 2009 Dec 4; 24:S28–50. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2009.09.011
44. Janssen WJM, Hoesein FM,
Van De Ven AAJM, Maarschalk J, Van Royen F, De Jong PA, et al. IgG trough
levels and progression of pulmonary disease in pediatric and adult common
variable immunodeficiency disorder patients. Journal of Allergy and Clinical
Immunology [Internet]. 2017 Jan 23; 140(1):303-306.e4. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2016.11.050
45. McCusker C, Upton J,
Warrington R. Primary immunodeficiency. Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology
[Internet]. 2018 Sep 1; 14(S2). Available from:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6157160/#Sec11
46. Marciano BE, Holland SM.
Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases: Current and emerging therapeutics. Frontiers
in Immunology [Internet]. 2017 Aug 8; 8. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00937
47. Ballow M, Division of
Allergy & Immunology, John Hopkins All Children’s Hospital, University of
South Florida. Prophylactic Antibiotics for Patients with Immunodeficiency.
Should Prophylactic Antibiotics Be Used in Primary Antibody Immune Deficiency?
[Internet]. Available from:
https://primaryimmune.org/sites/default/files/FOR%20WEB%20-%20Prophylactic%20Antibiotics%20PI.pdf
48. Hanitsch L, Baumann U,
Boztug K, Burkhard‐Meier U, Fasshauer M,
Habermehl P, et al. Treatment and management of primary antibody deficiency:
German interdisciplinary evidence‐based consensus guideline.
European Journal of Immunology [Internet]. 2020 Aug 26; 50(10):1432–46.
Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.202048713
49. Notarangelo LD. Primary
immunodeficiencies. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Internet]. 2009
Dec 30; 125(2):S182–94. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2009.07.053
50. Segundo GRS, Condino-Neto
A. Treatment of patients with immunodeficiency: Medication, gene therapy, and
transplantation. J Pediatria [Internet]. 2020 Nov 9; 97:S17–23. Available from:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9432285/